WSGA anniversary

I was invited to participate in a “geo art” project for the Washington State Geocaching Association’s (WSGA) anniversary. Though my contribution was pretty minimal, I did want to jot down some thoughts on what work went into doing this and why I think it was a success.

Geoart endeavors to draw or spell out something when geocaches are viewed on a map. For example, this was a series of 42 puzzles and a bonus, laid out just prior to Geowoodstock VIII, held in the greater Seattle area in 2010:

Peace Sign Series
It’s, like, visualizing whirled peas, man.

Or this smiley face northeast of Los Angeles:

More of a smirk, because it just wasn’t that pretty.

Or this awesome fighter jet west of Mountain Home, ID:

Thunderbird, near Mountain Home, ID

A handful of us met in June to discuss options for doing a giant “WSGA” to celebrate their tenth anniversary.  It was pretty surreal seeing how some folks were tightly focused on the appearance of the lettering at different map resolutions and points per letter and a reasonable font.  I was so glad I had my iPad on me so we could look at the results on a live screen. The magic number was 54 caches to spell out WSGA in reasonable clarity.

With that out of the way, we researched candidate locations. The constraints were as follows:

  • Since we don’t have a lot of open space for an awesome fighter jet (or the smile series), we’d need to rely on puzzles, which can be placed in tight pattern.  The actual final container must be within 2 miles of the posted faux coordinates.
  • To avoid geocache saturation, the container has to be at least 528′ (0.1 mile) away from any other physical waypoint.  Thus, we among all of us, we knew where all other puzzle and multi-caches were.
  • The Peace Sign Series had a bonus cache which one discovered by finding clues in 21 of the 42 other puzzle caches.  While it was the best location of them all, what predictably happened is the prerequisite caches cycle in and out of maintenance or people forget numbers along the way, becoming a huge pain in the ass.  It was unanimous: there would not be a bonus cache.
  • The caches should be in stable areas.  One of the folks prone to unconscious, dramatic exaggeration, kept referring to a specific area as (paraphrasing) “the polygon of death.”
  • The geocaches needed to be accessible enough that the cache owners would actually maintain them.

The last point is pretty important.  A local example of a series in Bellingham, “NUTS” was copied near Camano Island to spell “BUGZ.”  I think.  This is what’s left of it today as locations were flooded out and/or owners left them unmaintained:


Three candidate locations emerged.  One required taking a ferry, the other was in the mountains.  It’s hard enough to get people to maintain their caches that adding a trip to it is a deal-killer.  The remaining option was in southern Lake Washington, leaving us the question whether we could identify 54 locations confirming to the above limitations.  Since I have some familiarity with geoprojections, I sketched out crop circles.


So I had the easy part.  A group of other folks volunteered to scope out candidate locations for the physical containers.  Had this not happened, we’d … be planning the project for the 20th anniversary.

With the general locations scoped out, they sought help from a volunteer reviewer to put “dibs” on the spot, lest some random additional cache would pop up in its place.  Prying Pandora was really helpful in this regard.  Next, they sent out inquiries to various cachers to determine their interest level in creating — and maintaining — puzzles.  74 people were asked, 38 accepted

Washington State Geocaching Association – not as cool as a fighter jet in the middle of southern Idaho, but they’re still nice people.

I was assigned two puzzles and given six weeks to get everything in place.   That sounded like a long time back in June… then finally at the end of July, with the deadline looming, I visited each general location a few times to scope out what I’d do with it.

(To be continued)

1 thought on “WSGA anniversary”

  1. John Bailey

    Thanks for the background, Jim. I really enjoyed being able to participate in the project.

Comments are closed.