Product rebates are a curious application of drive-by marketing and probability theory. Companies offer them because they provide the perception of a lower price and allow the company to gather more information on its customers. You know, for future marketing purposes. The typical spiel looks like this
Consumers are naturally drawn to a perceived bargain. The problem is the
hidden costs make this less of a real bargain. Consider the choices: a vendor
can sell a product for $59.95 with a $20 rebate, OR they can just sell the
product for $39.95, no rebate.
Sales tax is calculated on the original purchase price, and we have to buy a stamp and envelope to get the rebate. We’re down $2.23 from where we thought we were.
Those expenses are easy to quantify. Now suppose it takes us five minutes to
fill out the form — collecting all of the rebate requirements and writing teeny, legible lettering. Assuming you earned $15/hour, that’s another $1.25 of indirect
costs. The rebate has lost $3.48 of its value ($2.23 + $1.25), and is now worth $16.52.
Why companies want to offer rebates.
Gather customer information.
When I did the Pancake Mix project, I had to rely on IRI data. It’s fine for generalizations, but I didn’t know why people buy.
Whenever you buy something that has a UPC code on it, that goes into a database.
IRI data is used in aggregate form to compute where, when, and how much things are sold for. When correlated with census tract information, a marketer can come up with good generalizations on the groups of people who buy their products.
Rebates add a specific name and address to a product purchase. A company now also has the opportunity to contact you later to sell additional products and/or make money supplying your name to “marketing partners.” A valid name and address can easily net $2.
Ever wonder why those product registration cards ask all sorts of
curious information about your lifestyle, ethnicity, income, pets, and children? Those are part of Experian’s BehaviorBank. There are lots of similar databases. Don’t want to share? Throw the cards away.
Because you may not apply for the rebate Whenever someone doesn’t apply for a rebate, the average cost of the rebate to the company declines. For example, assuming 25% of the people who purchase a rebate-eligible product don’t bother to apply, our $20 rebate above now costs the company, on average, $15. You’d be hard pressed to get such an easy return on your marketing money.
It’s a free loan to the company While you’re waiting for your rebate,
the company holds onto your money. This helps stabilize a company’s cash flow,
but more importantly, it is essentially a free loan.
Suppose I get the transdimensional warp generators from the Altarian Penal Colony on May 1. The Altarians demand payment in one week.
You buy one from me on May 5. The Altarians are paid off on May 8.
Sometime thereafter you apply for the $20 rebate. Let’s assume I receive that on May 8. I’ve told you it takes 4 – 6 weeks to “process the rebate.” Meanwhile, I’m
on the phone ordering my next shipment of transdimensional warp generators, paying for them using money I really owe you. I cut you a check on June 19th, but send
it the slowest way possible. You get it on the 24th, deposit it that day, and
the money is debited from my account on June 26th, while I’m planning on my third batch of transdimensional warp generators.
Because you may not follow the instructions All rebates require a
proof of purchase. This is reasonable because a company giving away
money would find more claimants than purchasers. But what consitutes proof?
A typical, benign rebate might require:
- UPC label
- Rebate form
- Purchase receipt
If a company wanted to be hardass about it, they’ll insist on more specific
instructions. Furthermore, many outsource their rebate processing to groups like TCA who act as the “bad cop” in enforcement.
Leave off any required information, and your rebate gets disqualified, with the company shrugging its shoulders:
- UPC code
- Official rebate form, fully filled out with lots of personal information. A facsimile is not acceptable.
- Original receipt with the purchase price circled. Circled. I said circled, not oval.
- Place of purchase
- Cover from the manual used in the previous version
- Nine Digit ZIP Code (unless you’re Canadian, which means your fancy-pants postal code has letters)
- A check for $3.99 for “shipping and handling.”
- Sworn, notarized affadavit of eligibility and waiver of exploitation*
- Handwritten lyrics to the theme from M.A.S.H.*
- Biopsy sample*
I’ve not been able to substantiate any specific numbers, but
I’ve heard 25% of the requests fail to include one of the “required” elements.
TCA’s web site brags about rejecting “800,000 fradulent and noncompliant claims.”
I can imagine several
of these are honest customers who may not remember where they’ve placed their
biopsy canisters before the rebate expires.
On a recent Netgear Router rebate, I noticed they included a clause saying
I had to apply for the rebate within four weeks of purchase. Sneaky. This
takes away any ability to return the product.
Because, after all that, you may not cash the check. This is called “slippage.” Estimates vary, but typically 10% of the checks are lost or not cashed in time.
Adding these up
We started with a $20 rebate whose average cost is now $6:
- -$2 kickback from information shared with partners
- -$5 because some customers don’t apply
- -$5 from disqualified rebates
- -$2 from checks not cashed
Next time: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Story time. I ALWAYS send in rebates even if it’s for two dollars. No way I’m lettin’ them keep my money.
Last time I used one it was for Excedrin Migraine. I bought the largest size and sent in all the stuff for the rebate, and they sent me back a letter telling me I didn’t qualify.
The following approximates my conversation when I called the company to complain:
Me – Um, yeah, I just got a stupid letter telling me I didn’t qualify for a rebate in my mailbox along with all my proof that I absolutely did qualify for a rebate.
Sales person – Your name.
Me – Debbie Soandso. I sent in the form, my receipt and the UPC. What was the problem?
Salesperson – You bought the largest size and the rebate was for medium.
Me – No, it was not. It was for Excedrin Migraine. No size was specified.
Salesperson – But the rebate only covered $3.00 of your purchase and your purchase was over three dollars.
Me – Uh, so why did you not send me the three dollars? It seems to me as if someone should have been able to subtract. Send me my money.
A week later, I got my rebate. A week after that, I got it AGAIN. The geniuses sent it out twice.
I should really keep track of my rebates better, but I note the following:
Epson — kicked back a rebate three months later because I did not include a receipt with the purchase price circled. I had long since lost the receipt (mistake #1) but Fry’s was happy to send me a copy from their home office. I finally got the rebate three weeks ago. Total elapsed time, 6 months.
ScanSoft — the asshats kicked back my $50 rebate on Dragon NaturallySpeaking because the front page of the previous edition’s manual wasn’t acceptable. They’ve also put me on their mailing list.
When I went on my Fry’s binge in September, I had eight rebates. I received all eight, but the turnaround time was anywhere from 8 weeks to 4 months.
The best rebate handling I’ve seen is Costco — go to their web site, type in the numbers on the receipt, provide your address, and the check comes in the mail. You can even track it.
I still think the whole rebate thing is evil, though.
I don’t mind the rebate lottery nearly as much as I gnash my teeth over the “Preferred Customer Discount Card” being hawked by nearly everyone. I just can’t help but get the feeling that my addiction to diet Cherry Coke is somehow now permanently noted in my FBI dossier – (note: I’m not being paranoid about a dossier – I have had four security clearance checks in my life, one of the Top Secret, and given the amount of time it took to do them, there must be FOUR dossiers as well). Worse than that, because I trust the FBI to keep that information secret forever (confidence inspired by the fact that the government is now reclassifying top secret manure scoop orders from WWII), I’m pretty concerned that Albertson’s can extrapolate that data and provide my current and any future ex-wives lawyer(s) with a pretty good idea of my annual income, preferred reading material, sugar dependency, and how much cholesterol I consume each day.
Now, I’m kind of fond of keeping personal stuff personal, but to require me to pay to keep that stuff private is just over the top. Energy inefficient, too, because I’m now forced to drive an additional 1.2 miles every time I want to conceal my shopping habits from Them. Over a year, if I bought stock instead of burning my cash, I could become a major shareholder in Exxon/Mobile/BP/Texaco/Lukoil/Yukos/RepublicanNationalCommittee, Inc.
There’s evil for you.
Comments are closed.